CO129-497 - Public Offices - 1926 — Page 407

Conside

Bat

the acquisition of the site

Could

hot L

A

violation of

Mi Treaty

and

Bat

Bu on

怂

Jaf

Ada

The Yor.

re commend

J

immediately

HK shr. Se auttorised proceed

with the purchase.

The following conson

(1) Notting

F.O. Concurrénu.

ansei-

can be done without

It is possible that Fo

Hal

immediate

ponjudia the

may acquisition

Fake

12:

view

would

only

negotiations

will

The Gods.

which wond

forbably ngat the acquisition as an

attempt li prejudge the issue.

11. transaction

comed

Lašly

h

Sina

a

han

would

And

Concealed

I nquind for it.

(2) Supposing Lowere that the FU

the acquisition the

に

Cohar

question of cost

remains

a

I

okt.

It is estimated that $1 million (about

would be sufficient 1Bay out

₤116,000)

I

Hi Kai Tak Company.

would be

$738,0

000

necessary

after which it

to spend a further

(about ₤86,000)

completing

IL:

time

reclamation

qualms

but timiss

htt

would

a Sout

Are

J

I and.

399 In normal

Lave ha

A

I imagine,

loan for this expenditure,

for from normal.

longs the boycott lasts

Ik Lave I dip into

Surplus Arschi expensitive

is Seen

EVG

Low big

Canton for the

and

until

detrained

would

h

怎

1

The

the deeper with

its (wot vay lage)

meet the

for en d

E

and

exccro

J

antie it

have to

Iram Ith with Loffer

Whi setelement the boycott,

Col's liabiliting have been

I can't

kawija

Commitment.

(3)

In any

Consulted again.

In Feb when it

help fuling that it

into forch

16 Culi

Choc

Sov. brile have to be

His proposal was made

Loped that

boycote would be related before long. The

prolonged

refacing,

deadlock Les shown the necessity for

Ikan

increring, expenditure.

Whats it wowed to possible becount on the

v. donsklud. Trade Loan for this purpon appress

I no question of

(4)

They could of

coum

16